Historic Hump Day
The Part-time Teaching Majority
Most teachers, despite their professional training and the responsibilities of their job, receive salaries below those paid to unskilled and semi-skilled workers...If the community wishes to retain its teachers and attract competent, energetic people into the profession, it must be willing to provide decent remuneration. -- Irving Gordon, 1956
As a college student in the late 1980s and early 1990s I was
ever only taught by one part-time teaching assistant and that was in
conjunction with a tenured faculty member who appeared occasionally. The
remainder of my instructors were full-time faculty members whose offices I
could regularly visit in person on campus. The data from the National Center
for Educational Statistics in 1993 supports that experience, noting only 40% of
faculty were part-time (Caprio, Dubowsky, Warasila, Cheatwood, and Costa, 1998).
Times have changed. Today, more than 70% of college faculty
are not tenured nor fulltime. They are paid per course, rarely are invited to
participate on committees or in governance and curriculum decisions, and are
not usually compensated when they are. In this regard, universities are missing
out on tapping one of their most plentiful and useful resources, as adjuncts
serve as viable liaisons between the academy and the professional world.
So where exactly are higher education institutions
positioning their professoriate within the whole of society if they are only
supporting and employing 30% of them on a full-time basis? How is this
impacting our nation? After all, “Faculty members perform research and
development work upon which this nation's technological and economic
advancement depends. Through their public service activities, they make valuable
contributions to society” (National Center for Education Statistics, 2014,
para. 1). If we have cut the percentage of full-time tenured and tenure-track
faculty in half over the past thirty years, are universities only making half
the societal impact they were?
What does the picture of adjunct faculty look like today?
This graphic designed and originally published by Dr.
Michelle Kassorla on her blog gives us an idea.
As an adjunct faculty member over the past 8 years, I have often felt ignored and
underappreciated by the universities for which I work. This is a common experience
of which The Adjunct Project is
attempting to gain a bigger picture, gathering data from adjuncts across the
USA regarding pay, working conditions, and benefits. How about you? Do you have
the option of health insurance, retirement benefits, participation in campus
committees or governance decisions? Please add your data to The Adjunct Project. When you do, you
get to see how it compares to others.
Also, please lend your voice to our own survey, and join me
tomorrow for Theoretical Thursday when we discuss the duties expected of
adjuncts, how they are evaluated, and resources for support and improvement.
See you then,
Melynda
#TCBHigherEd
References:
Caprio, M. W., Dubowsky, N., Warasila, R. L., Cheatwood, D.
D., & Costa, F. L. (1998) Adjunct faculty: A multidimensional perspective
on the important work of part-time faculty. Journal of College Science
Teaching, 28(3), 166-173.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2014). National
study of postsecondary faculty: Overview. Institute
of Education Sciences. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/surveys/nsopf/.

No comments:
Post a Comment